Singapore · Wednesday, September 30, 2026
asianomistAsia’s economy, daily.
Property Investment

Singapore PSD probes S$138m civil servant property deals

The Public Service Division is reviewing transactions between 2007 and 2011, after research cited 113 purchases totalling S$138 million near future MRT stations.

By Charmaine FooPublished 26 September 20262 min read
Photo: Zuper_Dragon / Pixabay

Review into property purchases

Singapore's Public Service Division (PSD) is investigating potential misconduct by civil servants who bought property near unannounced Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) station locations. This review follows a recently published research paper that identified a statistical link between rail planning officials and such property acquisitions.

The PSD stated on Friday, 25 September, that it is taking the paper's assertions seriously and is working to identify relevant transactions. The focus is on purchases made between 2007 and 2011 by officers involved in rail planning at that time, where properties were close to subsequently announced MRT stations.

NBER findings on informed trading

The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a US-based non-profit, published a working paper in September that found mid-level civil servants disproportionately acquired homes near planned but unannounced MRT stations.

The paper, authored by academics including Tomasz Piskorski from Columbia University and Amit Seru from Stanford University, cited an estimated 113 property purchases totalling S$138 million. This behaviour was concentrated one to two years before public announcements and showed "meaningful private gains", particularly over shorter holding periods. The NBER paper also observed this pattern among relatives, suggesting information leakage.

PSD's investigative approach and safeguards

The PSD acknowledges the statistical patterns are a concern but notes they do not automatically establish individual misconduct. Retrieving records and examining each case's circumstances will take time, given the transactions occurred some time ago. If evidence of non-public information misuse for personal benefit is found, cases will be referred to the police.

Singapore has safeguards in place; public officers must declare all property purchases and obtain approval for transactions if they have access to relevant non-public information. Declarations for private property purchases began in 1996, with an Internal Disclosure Policy framework implemented in 2011. The Public Sector (Governance) Act 2018 also criminalises such unauthorised use of information.

Market transparency and investor confidence

This review by the PSD shows Singapore's commitment to maintaining integrity within its public service and ensuring fair market practices. For investors in Singapore's real estate market, a clear and transparent regulatory environment is crucial.

The outcome of this investigation could reinforce confidence in the market's integrity, particularly regarding information asymmetry in property development. Continued scrutiny and enforcement of existing regulations will shape perceptions of fairness, influencing investment decisions and market stability in the city-state's property sector.

This article is journalism, not investment advice; consult a licensed professional before making financial decisions. Market data is indicative, may be delayed, and should be verified with your broker or exchange before use.

Comments.

Comments are moderated. We remove what is unlawful, abusive or off-topic, and and you remain responsible for what you post.

Reader comments open soon. Until then, corrections and responses go to our newsroom, and we publish what we get wrong on Corrections.