Pune ITAT Cancels ₹2.21 Lakh Tax Penalty for Bosch Employee
The tribunal's 2 September 2026 ruling for Dilip Gangaram Mali shows that taxpayers remain accountable for income tax return accuracy, even when using a consultant.
Penalty Overturned for Bosch Employee
India's Pune Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has cancelled a ₹2.21 lakh income tax penalty levied against Dilip Gangaram Mali, an employee of Bosch. The tribunal's order, issued on 2 September 2026, concerned assessment years 2017–18 and 2018–19. Mali faced the penalty after his tax consultant allegedly claimed deductions that he later disputed. This decision comes after Mali revised his income tax return and paid additional dues.
Prompt Rectification and Consultant's History
Mali proactively filed a revised return on 6 June 2019, increasing his declared income for 2017–18 from ₹5.06 lakh to ₹9.12 lakh. He also paid ₹1,02,875 towards additional tax and interest before the Income Tax Department could issue a reassessment notice. The ITAT noted Mali's swift corrective action as a key factor.
Furthermore, the tribunal referenced a 2025 ruling involving the same tax consultant, which revealed a pattern of allegedly claiming excessive deductions for multiple clients without their explicit knowledge.
Tribunal Cites Penalty Order Flaws
Beyond Mali's prompt compliance, the ITAT also identified shortcomings in the original penalty order. These related to the specific misreporting provision invoked under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act.
Based on these observations, including the pre-emptive payment and the previous issues with the consultant, the ITAT instructed the Assessing Officer to remove the penalty for both assessment years. This shows the tribunal's consideration of both taxpayer conduct and procedural accuracy in penalty imposition.
Taxpayer Responsibility for Filings
This ruling shows that individuals remain responsible for the accuracy of their income tax returns. Taxpayers must verify all details before submission, even when a professional prepares the documents on their behalf. They should be aware of current tax laws and applicable provisions. Any detected errors or omissions must be corrected promptly, and any additional tax and interest paid without delay.
This article is journalism, not investment advice; consult a licensed professional before making financial decisions. Market data is indicative, may be delayed, and should be verified with your broker or exchange before use.
Comments.
Comments are moderated. We remove what is unlawful, abusive or off-topic, and and you remain responsible for what you post.
Reader comments open soon. Until then, corrections and responses go to our newsroom, and we publish what we get wrong on Corrections.